NEET UG 2025: Tougher Questions, Tighter Competition, and the Growing Pressure on India’s Medical Aspirants

The Gateway to India’s Medical Dream

The National Eligibility cum Entrance Test for Undergraduates (NEET UG) is more than just an exam—it is a gateway to one of the most sought-after career paths in India: medicine. Conducted annually by the National Testing Agency (NTA), NEET is the sole entrance examination for admission to MBBS, BDS, BAMS, BHMS, and other allied health courses in both government and private institutions across India. With millions of students competing for a limited number of seats, NEET reflects both the aspirations of Indian youth and the structural challenges in the country’s medical education landscape.

In 2025, the test was conducted on May 4 across 5,453 centres in more than 500 cities. However, early student reactions suggest that Physics proved to be a major hurdle for many—potentially affecting cut-off trends and admission chances.

NEET 2025 Registrations: Slight Dip, But Intensity Remains High

This year, approximately 23 lakh students registered for NEET UG 2025, compared to 24.06 lakh in 2024. While this marks a slight decrease, it still reinforces NEET’s status as one of the most competitive entrance exams in the world.

The competition is staggering: with 1.20 lakh MBBS seats available nationwide, roughly 19 aspirants are vying for each seat. This high ratio underscores not only the popularity of medicine as a profession, but also the severe pressure placed on students to succeed in a single, high-stakes test.

Exam Day and Pattern: Standard Format, Strict Conduct

NEET 2025 retained its established structure: three core subjects—Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (Botany and Zoology)—with a total of 720 marks. The exam was conducted in a single shift from 2 PM to 5 PM, with strict entry protocols.

Students were required to report hours in advance, carrying multiple identification documents and photographs in various formats. This year, security was especially stringent due to controversies surrounding the 2024 exam, prompting NTA to implement enhanced vigilance measures to maintain credibility and fairness.

Student Reactions: Physics a Major Roadblock

The dominant sentiment among students this year: Physics was unexpectedly tough.

·       Mayank Kumar, a second-time aspirant, noted that even experienced candidates found it difficult to secure full marks in the Physics section.

·       Abha Singh, a first-time test-taker from Lucknow, expressed that while she hadn’t expected to score highly in her first attempt, the difficulty of Physics and Chemistry still came as a shock.

·       Saurabh, who took the test in Chandigarh, said the length of the Physics questions created fear at first glance, affecting his confidence mid-exam.

·       Deepak Singla observed that while Biology followed NCERT closely, Physics did not.

Kunal Singh, a NEET coaching expert, pointed out that this year’s Physics section borrowed questions resembling JEE Main and even JEE Advanced levels—raising the difficulty and catching students off guard.

These accounts suggest a divergence from previous years, where Physics was tough but largely within NEET’s academic scope. This time, the unexpected rigor of Physics may significantly impact student scores and lower the cut-off.

Cut-off Trends and Seat Competition: What Lies Ahead

Given the difficulty level of this year’s Physics paper, cut-off scores are expected to drop, particularly for unreserved categories. This may open doors for students who performed well in Biology and Chemistry, but it also raises concerns about exam consistency and transparency.

With 23 lakh aspirants chasing just over 1.2 lakh MBBS seats, even a slight dip in difficulty can reshape the selection landscape. For students, that means no margin for error. For policymakers, it signals the need to re-evaluate how exams are designed and whether a single paper should continue to determine the fate of millions.

Policy Reflections: Is It Time to Rethink Medical Admissions?

The increasing reliance on NEET as the sole gateway to medical education places enormous stress on aspirants and their families. The mismatch between the number of aspirants and the availability of seats continues to be a structural concern.

Moreover, coaching culture—especially in metros and tier-2 cities—is becoming nearly indispensable, making medical dreams inaccessible for students from underprivileged backgrounds. The regional imbalance in seat distribution and the dominance of private institutions further aggravate inequality.

While NEET ensures standardization, the question remains: is one exam enough to evaluate aptitude for a career as critical and complex as medicine?

Beyond Marks, Toward Meaningful Reform

NEET UG 2025 has once again proven that medical entrance in India is as much about resilience as it is about knowledge. The Physics paper served as a sobering reminder of the unpredictable nature of high-stakes exams, where even the most prepared students can falter due to last-minute surprises.

As lakhs of students await results and brace for counselling rounds, the focus must shift beyond numbers—to support systems, accessibility, and mental health. If India aims to nurture not just more doctors but better doctors, the admission process must evolve to recognize potential alongside performance.

The dream to wear a white coat shouldn’t be crushed under the weight of a single tough paper.

(With inputs from agencies)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *